“Consider the work of God; who can make straight what he has made crooked?” I read. The words were not in their familiar black print, atop the white thin paper found in my Bible, but in white print, on a black screen, in the opening scene of the 1997 film, Gattaca.
For those of you unfamiliar with the story, it is set in the not-too-distant future, at a time when American society has moved beyond the simple “natural” birthing process, where a man and a woman fall in love, leaving the genetic makeup of their child to God or chance, and instead, have turned to the controlled and complicated process of genetic engineering. The egg and sperm still belong to the birth parents, but these basic single-celled units are manipulated at the genetic level so that “the best of the best” of the mother and father are what go into making their child.
The plot of the story centers around a young man named Vincent. Vincent is unique among all of his peers because Vincent was born without genetic engineering, or as they call him in the story, a child “born of love.” Throughout the course of the narrative, we come to realize that this individual, the one who has been characterized as “having something wrong with him,” is the individual who does something right. Vincent assumes an alternate identity (he becomes “one of them”), so that he can move to the top of an organization that only accepts the cream of the genetic crop – he becomes a pilot and an astronaut.
Vincent’s accomplishments teach us that even though he may not have a strong genetically-engineered body with the perfect heart, chiseled arms, and dreamy eyes and hair, he’s strong in other ways – in courage, in hope, in discipline… the misfit of the group proves to have unique and redeeming qualities that no one had expected. This person who was unlike everyone else, who wasn’t just “different,” but believed to be “sub-par,” proves to the normative culture that those on the margins have something to offer the rest of society, if society would only afford them the same chance as everyone else.
What a lovely story. What “good” American doesn’t enjoy a story about the underdog, against all odds, winning in the end? Though I thoroughly appreciate the message of this story, and found myself moved to tears on occasion, when it came to the end, I was distracted by one thought: why had the filmmakers used Ecclesiastes 7:13 to open the movie? “Consider the work of God; who can make straight what he has made crooked?” This quote didn’t come from the screenwriter of Gattaca, it came from the Hebrew Bible – the very book that we, Christians, consider to be the Word of God. So what was it about the Word of God that these people found fitting for their movie – why was the story of “the crooked man” winning against “the straight men,” so moving? Before we can answer this question as Christians informed by Scripture, let’s take a look at this verse in its context.
Ecclesiastes 7 is filled with juxtaposition: “the day of death” is better “than the day of birth” (7:1). The “house of mourning” is better than “the house of feasting” (7:2), “Sorrow is better than laughter” (7:3), “Better is the end of a thing than its beginning” (7:8), but by the time we get to 7:13, something has changed; something seems different: “Consider the work of God; who can make straight what he has made[1] crooked?” I don’t know about you, but out of the verses mentioned, this is the first one that took me by surprise. I can see the good in sorrow and the bittersweet joy of goodbyes, but what’s good about something being crooked? Why would God intentionally make something crooked?
Webster’s dictionary defines “crooked,” as “not straight.” As far as the English language is concerned, straight is the norm, thus the absence of straightness is “crookedness.” As Christians, we get this. It’s similar to Gregory of Nyssa’s notion of “darkness” as “the absence of light,” and the Augustinian idea that “sin” is actually “the absence of goodness.” What is considered good is always the norm, and what is not good is the absence of that norm – it is the non-substance – it is that which just doesn’t exist, or if anything, just barely exists – but it only exists because of human sin, right?! Crooked things don’t exist because God made them! Right?!
Webster confirms this line of thinking in that the only other definition supplied for “crooked” is “dishonest.” Wow. Being crooked does NOT sound like a very good thing. And yet, here, in Ecclesiastes, we read, “Consider the work of God; who can make straight what he has made crooked?” Wow, again. If “crookedness” is “bad,” how could God make something “crooked” when God is good and can only make good things? Exasperating! And yet, if I’m not taking this verse more seriously than I ought, I find that I have to ask the following question: instead of wondering how God could make something bad, and asking, “why?,” should I be wondering why I seem to think being “crooked” is bad, since Ecclesiastes is clear in defining it as one of God’s good creations?
A man we Americans know as “Edward Monkton” is a brilliant artist who creates funny greeting cards. You can find his work in places like Borders and Barnes and Noble. Whenever I go card shopping, I look for the latest “Monkton.” My favorite greeting card to date is one titled, “The Law of Straightness.” With corresponding pictures of pencils, socks, pillows and french fries all lined up in a row, the author writes, “my pencils are straight, my socks are straight, my pillow is straight, my chips are straight… everything must be straight or else the world will explode. Those who do not believe in the law of straightness will not be saved.”
What was Monkton getting at?
It’s common knowledge that in today’s culture the word “straight” often stands for the word “heterosexual.” Why is that, I wondered? Just a few weeks ago, I was walking through the halls, going over my Hebrew flashcards. I was finding it difficult to remember one word – yashar. I kept repeating it over and over again, but couldn’t get it right. The word is an adjective that means “upright, just, level, straight,” and so, in a moment of epiphany, I thought to myself, “I know how I can remember this!” And I proceeded to walk through the hallways smiling at people, and as I looked at each one I thought to myself, “you’re yashar” and “you’re yashar,” and “you’re yashar.” I equated “straight” to mean “heterosexual!” When I first read this Monkton card, I thought that might be what Monkton was getting at. “Maybe he’s trying to make a statement about gay people?” I thought. But now, I’m not so sure.
So what do I think Monkton was getting at? I think he was trying to get at us: at you and at me. Trying to get at humans and our inclination toward having everything neat and tidy – trying to help us to see ourselves as we are – people who want things straight.
Obviously, the writer of Ecclesiastes was not talking about sexual orientation, either. The notion of heterosexuality, or “being straight,” didn’t come into existence until the late 1800s, and wasn’t officially found in an English dictionary until the 1900s. The same goes for the term “homosexuality.” So if this verse isn’t about the “right way to be” sexually, then what is it about? Simply put, it’s about a God who makes some things crooked, and a people who tend to want everything to be straight.
Well, if you like your home nice and orderly, and you like to keep your beliefs all lined up in a row, then just know that you’re not the only one, that’s for sure! In fact, Peter and Paul were trying to do the very same thing thousands of years ago when Gentiles started becoming Christians. Peter seems to have said something like, “Whoa, Gentiles? This is not my thing. I’m called to the Jews – to the straight people.” He was not ready to mess up his worldview. And so Jesus went to a man named Saul, turned his world of light into darkness; quite literally, blinding him as he was riding down the road toward Damascus, and helped him to realize that the “crooked” people needed God, too.
So Paul begins to preach to the Gentiles – to the “not-straight,” non-normative people eating non-kosher food, wearing non-kosher clothes, and being altogether different from anyone the God of the Jews has ever been close to before. All of a sudden, this was Paul’s “thing.” He moved from caring only for the straight Jews to also caring for the crooked Gentiles. But God didn’t stop there. He ended up going back to Peter and giving him a dream about snakes and pigs and all the foods that Jews were not allowed to eat, and showing him that even though his “calling” is to the Jews, he has to at least begin to eat with these “others,” even though, for him, it felt really unnatural. God was doing a new thing, and it wasn’t what everyone thought it was going to be, or even what they thought it should be. This God whom everyone thought was always doing “natural” things began to do some unnatural things, and wanted all of the disciples of Jesus on board!
Paul hits on this whole “unnatural” subject in Romans 11. First he talks to us about the norm – about the Jews – he says that he’s one of the Jews – in fact, he’s one of the really great Jews (at one point, he lists item after item off the checklist that makes him a “good” Jew), and from this position of “normative” power – this position of being the “straight” one, he tells us that God, yet again, did something “crooked,” something unexpected, something unnatural:
For if you have been cut from what is by nature a wild olive tree and grafted, contrary to nature, into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these natural branches be grafted back into their own olive tree. (Romans 11:24, NRSV)
What does it mean to do something “contrary to nature?” Does it mean that God did something God doesn’t normally do? I don’t think so. This verse reminds me a lot of Ecclesiastes 7:13. It seems to me that just like God sometimes makes things “crooked,” God, likewise, sometimes does things “crooked.” But here, crooked doesn’t mean “dishonest,” it means, “unconventional,” “not-normative,” “not-straight.” Thomas Aquinas wrote something similar in his commentary on Romans 11:24. He writes,
[this material is currently unavailable, as it is pending publication] [2]
Unbelievable! God makes things crooked and does things crooked, and this is “natural” for God, and “natural” in the thing or person in which God does it!
With this in mind, it seems to me that Webster needs to come up with a new definition of “crooked,” for it was by this “crooked” act of God that we, Gentiles, are saved! God seems to be purposefully messing up our “straightness” – and throwing a little diversity into the mix, don’t you think? Just think about the diversity of humanity for a second. Think about the differences in eye color, hair color, skin color… now think about the different categories we assign people: nationalities, genders, sexual orientations… wow. Is it possible that this variation comes from a God who doesn’t like all of the pencils lined up in a straight row? If so, maybe we need to give God more room to be God – not just in the world around us, but in our own day-to-day lives…
Hmm… that sounds a little scary. Being messy and letting everyone else see that we’re messy is not something most people like to do. We only want A papers on the refrigerator, we only want people over when the house is clean. So before we can just hop on this “messy train,” maybe we need to start to change our thinking. As we dive deeper into the realization that God doesn’t make everything straight, we have to ask ourselves why we have always thought of God as just the opposite. I’m quite certain that there are multiple reasons why we want things straight – a few good reasons might be popping into your mind right now. When I think about this notion, myself, I think it has something to do with the fact that we most commonly like to think of God as orderly, logical, sterile and otherly, because it makes us feel safe and secure. We like to imagine that someone isn’t affected by all this mess that we are in, and that there is someone who is cool-headed and level – someone who is “straight.” But I don’t know that that is the picture of God that our Bible gives us, is it? If so, then there are certainly a lot of things we’d have to cut out. Apart from Ecclesiastes 7:13 and Romans 11:24, we’d have to cut out the Incarnation and the Crucifixion! There’s nothing messier than a God who becomes human, is there?!
For whatever reason, we sometimes choose to forget just how wild and messy the real story about God and humankind is! It’s a story about God being born with a belly button. About Jesus being attached to his mother, entering the world covered in his mother’s blood, having a ministry that involved him touching lepers and prostitutes until people became so mad at him for being different that they beat him up to the point that he ended up leaving the world covered in his own blood. That’s about as messy as you can get! So what if instead of feeling unsafe in messy circumstances, we begin to change our perspective? Because of that life lived so messily, we can feel a very different kind of “safety.” Instead, we can feel like this might mean that when my life is messy Jesus is right there with me – that I don’t have to keep my socks and my pencils all in a row for God to love me, for God to want me. God was willing to get things REALLY messy. Maybe it’s not so shameful to do messy things, after all?
So if our goal is to be like Christ – if our goal is to be transformed into the image of God’s Son who lived a very messy life on this earth, how can we begin to focus our attention on being “less straight,” and a bit more “crooked,” in the same way that God makes and does crooked things? Well for starters, we can ask ourselves who the crooked people are in our lives. Who are the crooked people in crooked circumstances that I come in contact with when I’m at work, when I’m at church, when I’m at home? Who are the non-normative people doing non-normative things around me? Can you meet God where God is? Can you meet God in those who are different from the norm – those who might even be different from you?
Even though these verses aren’t about heterosexual orientation, for you, maybe being willing to get a little messy has something to do with inviting that homosexual couple who lives down the road over to your place for dinner, or maybe, for you, it has something to do with inviting that person of another skin color into your team at work, or it might mean being willing to listen to that preacher of another gender, or a brother or sister who has a different theological perspective than your own. Like Vincent, our non-genetically engineered friend from the movie, Gattaca, these people, too, are “born of love” – the love of God – the same God who made you and me, the same God who made crooked and straight. And they just might have something to teach us – something to teach us about ourselves, and about God.
[1] The Hebrew word used here is עשה which literally means “to do, to make, to create.”
[2] Eugene Rogers, “Paul on Exceeding Nature: Queer Gentiles and the Giddy Gardner,” 2009, unpublished Chapter 1 of a forthcoming book on Romans, (p. 21).